Tucker Water Hardness & Quality Report (2026)
Water Hardness
~0–59 mg/L
Softestimated · not lab-verified
Source
reservoir
pH Level
7.8
neutral = 7.0
Lead
0.005 mg/L
✓ Below action level
TDS
233.7 mg/L
Est. Daily Cost
$0.08
energy & soap waste
Source: See methodology section below · Updated 2026
0–60
mg/L
Soft
61–120
mg/L
Moderately Hard
121–180
mg/L
Hard
180+
mg/L
Very Hard
Appliance Damage Report
In Tucker, your appliances are currently losing 4% efficiency due to mineral buildup.
| Appliance | In Tucker | Soft Water City | Efficiency Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kettle | 8.2 yrs | 8.5 yrs | -4% |
| Washing Machine | 11.5 yrs | 12 yrs | -4% |
| Water Heater | 14.4 yrs | 15 yrs | -4% |
Regional Water Comparison
How Tucker compares to its nearest neighbours
| City | Hardness | PFAS (ppt) | Risk | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ Tucker, Georgia | ≈ 0–59 mg/L | 6.5 ppt | 🟢 Soft | reservoir |
| Clarkston, Georgia | ≈ 0–60 mg/L | 5.9 ppt | 🟢 Soft | reservoir |
| Doraville, Georgia | ≈ 0–60 mg/L | 8.1 ppt | 🟢 Soft | reservoir |
| Scottdale, Georgia | ≈ 120–179 mg/L | 5.8 ppt | 🟠 Hard | reservoir |
| Lilburn, Georgia | ≈ 0–60 mg/L | 4.6 ppt | 🟢 Soft | reservoir |
National Benchmark
How Tucker compares to the USA average
| Benchmark | Hardness | Appliance Risk |
|---|---|---|
| ▶ Tucker | ≈ 0–59 mg/L | 🟢 None |
| USA National Avg | 151 mg/L | 🟠 Moderate |
| Scarsdale Top Rated | 0.02 mg/L | 🟢 None |
Bring Scarsdale-quality water to your Tucker home
Shop water softeners on Amazon.com →
What Makes Tucker's Water Unique?
Local geology and source profile
Tucker, Georgia (ZIP 30084), is served by DeKalb County, which supplies water to approximately 743,000 people across the service area. The utility draws from surface water sources treated at DeKalb County-managed facilities; no specific treatment plant names for Tucker are available in published data. The Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources, serving adjacent areas from similar regional sources, reports consistent water quality testing. Treatment follows conventional surface water processes: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection before distribution to residents.
The water originates from watersheds in the Georgia Piedmont physiographic province, encompassing the Upper Chattahoochee and Oconee River basins. Dominant geology features ancient metamorphic rocks — gneiss and schist with granitic intrusions — dating from the Precambrian to Paleozoic eras. These crystalline rock types resist mineral dissolution, limiting the leaching of calcium and magnesium, and produce a characteristically soft supply with low natural mineralization, shaped by low weathering rates and acidic soils overlaying the formations.
As a soft water supply, Tucker's water poses minimal scaling risk to water heaters, dishwashers, and faucets; soap lathers easily, reducing detergent use. No water softener is needed. However, soft water carries higher pipe corrosion potential — use corrosion inhibitors if metallic tastes arise, and maintain routine filter changes. DeKalb County reports no MCL violations, with two contaminants above EPA health guidelines in recent data; treatment involves conventional surface water processes, and specific pH, lead, copper, and PFAS details are available in the utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Geology & Source: Georgia Piedmont — Precambrian-Paleozoic metamorphic and igneous rocks including gneiss, schist, and granite in the Chattahoochee and Upper Oconee watersheds; crystalline bedrock resists mineral dissolution, yielding characteristically soft water
Other Georgia Water Reports
Report an Issue
Notice an error or missing data? Help us keep this page accurate. If you spot incorrect water hardness, outdated utility info, or missing details, please let us know.
All reports are reviewed by our team. Thank you for supporting data quality!
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tucker's water safe to drink?
Do I need a water softener in Tucker?
How does Tucker compare to the USA average?
Data Sources & Methodology
Water quality data for Tucker is derived from geographic and geological modelling of the surrounding region. No federal monitoring station data was available for this location.
Water Hardness
Modelled estimate based on state-level USGS geological survey data for this region. No direct USGS Water Quality Portal measurement was matched to this city — the value reflects a statistical range calibrated to the state's dominant rock types and typical source water characteristics.
pH
Estimated from regional geology and source water characteristics. pH is correlated with water hardness and local bedrock — values may differ from utility-reported figures.
TDS — Total Dissolved Solids
Estimated using a derived ratio from water hardness and regional conductance profiles. TDS in natural water correlates strongly with total mineral content including hardness ions.
PFAS — Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
EPA UCMR5 (5th Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, 2023–2025) — sum of PFAS compounds detected at the public water system serving this city. A value of 0 indicates the system was sampled with no detection above reporting limits.
Lead
Modelled estimate based on the EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile tap-sample methodology. No publicly available per-city lead dataset with sufficient national coverage exists. Values are a conservative baseline derived from city population tier and infrastructure age — all estimates are maintained below the EPA action level of 0.015 mg/L.
Appliance Lifespan
Calculated from water hardness using a linear degradation model. Baseline lifespans represent soft-water performance (kettle: 8.5 yrs, washing machine: 12.0 yrs, water heater: 15.0 yrs). Hard water mineral scale progressively reduces operational life in direct proportion to hardness concentration.