Roseville Water Hardness & Quality Report (2026)
Water Hardness
~120–179 mg/L
Hardestimated · not lab-verified
Source
river
pH Level
8.5
neutral = 7.0
Lead
0.009 mg/L
✓ Below action level
TDS
758 mg/L
Est. Daily Cost
$0.40
energy & soap waste
Source: See methodology section below · Updated 2026
0–60
mg/L
Soft
61–120
mg/L
Moderately Hard
121–180
mg/L
Hard
180+
mg/L
Very Hard
Appliance Damage Report
In Roseville, your appliances are currently losing 20% efficiency due to mineral buildup.
| Appliance | In Roseville | Soft Water City | Efficiency Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kettle | 6.8 yrs | 8.5 yrs | -20% |
| Washing Machine | 9.6 yrs | 12 yrs | -20% |
| Water Heater | 12 yrs | 15 yrs | -20% |
Regional Water Comparison
How Roseville compares to its nearest neighbours
| City | Hardness | PFAS (ppt) | Risk | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ Roseville, Minnesota | ≈ 120–179 mg/L | 51.2 ppt | 🟠 Hard | river |
| Little Canada, Minnesota | ≈ 120–179 mg/L | 5.5 ppt | 🟠 Hard | groundwater |
| Shoreview, Minnesota | 257 mg/L | 39.9 ppt | 🔴 Very Hard | groundwater |
| New Brighton, Minnesota | 410.88 mg/L | 51.2 ppt | 🔴 Very Hard | groundwater |
| Saint Paul, Minnesota | ≈ 60–120 mg/L | 10 ppt | 🟡 Moderately Hard | river |
National Benchmark
How Roseville compares to the USA average
| Benchmark | Hardness | Appliance Risk |
|---|---|---|
| ▶ Roseville | ≈ 120–179 mg/L | 🟠 Moderate |
| USA National Avg | 151 mg/L | 🟠 Moderate |
| Scarsdale Top Rated | 0.02 mg/L | 🟢 None |
Bring Scarsdale-quality water to your Roseville home
Shop water softeners on Amazon.com →
What Makes Roseville's Water Unique?
Local geology and source profile
Roseville, Minnesota is served by the City of Roseville Water Utility, which purchases treated water from St. Paul Regional Water Service and distributes it through more than 100 miles of municipal pipes to residential and commercial customers throughout the city. The utility is required by the EPA to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report detailing all detected substances and water quality parameters, with testing conducted multiple times throughout the year by sampling from residents' homes across the service area.
The Twin Cities watershed supplying Roseville is underlain by Paleozoic-age carbonate and sandstone formations dominated by dolomite and limestone aquifers — remnants of ancient marine environments. These mineral-rich rock formations, particularly calcite and dolomite deposits, naturally dissolve into groundwater as it percolates through the aquifer system, leaching calcium and magnesium ions that create the hard water supply characteristic of the entire Twin Cities metropolitan area.
Roseville's hard water causes noticeable mineral buildup in pipes, appliances, and fixtures throughout the home. Water heaters, dishwashers, and washing machines are particularly affected by scale accumulation, which reduces efficiency and shortens equipment lifespan. Residents commonly experience dry skin and dull hair after bathing, and soap and detergent effectiveness is diminished. Many homeowners install water softeners to mitigate these effects and extend appliance longevity, though softening is not universally required.
Geology & Source: Twin Cities glaciated terrain; Paleozoic-age dolomite and limestone aquifers — calcite and dolomite dissolve calcium and magnesium into groundwater, producing hard water typical of the metropolitan area
Other Minnesota Water Reports
Report an Issue
Notice an error or missing data? Help us keep this page accurate. If you spot incorrect water hardness, outdated utility info, or missing details, please let us know.
All reports are reviewed by our team. Thank you for supporting data quality!
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Roseville's water safe to drink?
Do I need a water softener in Roseville?
How does Roseville compare to the USA average?
Data Sources & Methodology
Water quality data for Roseville is derived from geographic and geological modelling of the surrounding region. No federal monitoring station data was available for this location.
Water Hardness
Modelled estimate based on state-level USGS geological survey data for this region. No direct USGS Water Quality Portal measurement was matched to this city — the value reflects a statistical range calibrated to the state's dominant rock types and typical source water characteristics.
pH
Estimated from regional geology and source water characteristics. pH is correlated with water hardness and local bedrock — values may differ from utility-reported figures.
TDS — Total Dissolved Solids
Estimated using a derived ratio from water hardness and regional conductance profiles. TDS in natural water correlates strongly with total mineral content including hardness ions.
PFAS — Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
EPA UCMR5 (5th Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, 2023–2025) — sum of PFAS compounds detected at the public water system serving this city. A value of 0 indicates the system was sampled with no detection above reporting limits.
Lead
Modelled estimate based on the EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile tap-sample methodology. No publicly available per-city lead dataset with sufficient national coverage exists. Values are a conservative baseline derived from city population tier and infrastructure age — all estimates are maintained below the EPA action level of 0.015 mg/L.
Appliance Lifespan
Calculated from water hardness using a linear degradation model. Baseline lifespans represent soft-water performance (kettle: 8.5 yrs, washing machine: 12.0 yrs, water heater: 15.0 yrs). Hard water mineral scale progressively reduces operational life in direct proportion to hardness concentration.