Sherman Water Hardness & Quality Report (2026)
Water Hardness
10.7 grains per gallon
Source
reservoir
pH Level
8.1
neutral = 7.0
Lead
0.007 mg/L
β Below action level
TDS
950.8 mg/L
Est. Daily Cost
$0.49
energy & soap waste
Source: See methodology section below Β· Updated 2026
0β60
mg/L
Soft
61β120
mg/L
Moderately Hard
121β180
mg/L
Hard
180+
mg/L
Very Hard
Appliance Damage Report
In Sherman, your appliances are currently losing 25% efficiency due to mineral buildup.
| Appliance | In Sherman | Soft Water City | Efficiency Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kettle | 3.5 yrs | 8.5 yrs | -59% |
| Washing Machine | 6.8 yrs | 12 yrs | -43% |
| Water Heater | 8.2 yrs | 15 yrs | -45% |
Regional Water Comparison
How Sherman compares to its nearest neighbours
| City | Hardness | PFAS (ppt) | Risk | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| βΆ Sherman, Texas | 184 mg/L | 35.3 ppt | π΄ Very Hard | reservoir |
| Denison, Texas | β 180+ mg/L | 0 ppt | π΄ Very Hard | reservoir |
| Anna, Texas | β 180+ mg/L | 15.9 ppt | π΄ Very Hard | reservoir |
| Durant, Oklahoma | β 120β179 mg/L | 0 ppt | π Hard | reservoir |
| Bonham, Texas | β 120β179 mg/L | 7.9 ppt | π Hard | reservoir |
National Benchmark
How Sherman compares to the USA average
| Benchmark | Hardness | Appliance Risk |
|---|---|---|
| βΆ Sherman | 184 mg/L | π΄ High |
| USA National Avg | 151 mg/L | π Moderate |
| Scarsdale Top Rated | 0.02 mg/L | π’ None |
Bring Scarsdale-quality water to your Sherman home
Shop water softeners on Amazon.com β
What Makes Sherman's Water Unique?
Local geology and source profile
City of Sherman Water serves approximately 45,000 residents in Sherman, Grayson County, Texas. Primary sources include surface water from Lake Texoma and local reservoirs, supplemented by groundwater. Treatment occurs at the city's water treatment plants using conventional filtration with granular activated carbon and sand, followed by demineralization and advanced membrane processes including ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis to reduce dissolved salts and hardness. This combination of surface and groundwater treatment delivers a consistently treated supply to residents throughout the Red River watershed region.
The watershed encompasses the Red River basin, feeding Lake Texoma, a major reservoir on the Texas-Oklahoma border. Underlying geology includes Cretaceous-era formations such as the Woodbine Sand and Trinity Group limestones, which form productive aquifers in Grayson County. These carbonate-rich layers contribute to a hard supply through mineral leaching, while surface waters pick up dissolved ions from sedimentary rock weathering, resulting in naturally mineralised water prior to treatment.
Hard water at 184 mg/L promotes scale buildup in water heaters, dishwashers, washing machines, and faucets, where mineral deposits clog and corrode components, reducing efficiency and lifespan. Regular descaling, vinegar rinses, and professional maintenance help mitigate these effects. A water softener is recommended for households to prevent spotting on dishes, dry skin and hair, and to extend appliance life. The 2023 CCR confirms turbidity compliance; no violations noted for lead, copper, or PFAS. Low arsenic and trihalomethane detections remain below health guidelines, and the system earns excellent compliance grades.
Geology & Source: Red River basin; Cretaceous Woodbine Sand and Trinity Group limestones and dolomites in Grayson Countyβcarbonate dissolution yields hard water; surface supply from Lake Texoma treated with reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration
Other Texas Water Reports
Report an Issue
Notice an error or missing data? Help us keep this page accurate. If you spot incorrect water hardness, outdated utility info, or missing details, please let us know.
All reports are reviewed by our team. Thank you for supporting data quality!
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sherman's water safe to drink?
Do I need a water softener in Sherman?
How does Sherman compare to the USA average?
Data Sources & Methodology
Water quality data for Sherman is derived from geographic and geological modelling of the surrounding region. No federal monitoring station data was available for this location.
Water Hardness
Modelled estimate based on state-level USGS geological survey data for this region. No direct USGS Water Quality Portal measurement was matched to this city β the value reflects a statistical range calibrated to the state's dominant rock types and typical source water characteristics.
pH
Estimated from regional geology and source water characteristics. pH is correlated with water hardness and local bedrock β values may differ from utility-reported figures.
TDS β Total Dissolved Solids
Estimated using a derived ratio from water hardness and regional conductance profiles. TDS in natural water correlates strongly with total mineral content including hardness ions.
PFAS β Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
EPA UCMR5 (5th Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, 2023β2025) β sum of PFAS compounds detected at the public water system serving this city. A value of 0 indicates the system was sampled with no detection above reporting limits.
Lead
Modelled estimate based on the EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile tap-sample methodology. No publicly available per-city lead dataset with sufficient national coverage exists. Values are a conservative baseline derived from city population tier and infrastructure age β all estimates are maintained below the EPA action level of 0.015 mg/L.
Appliance Lifespan
Calculated from water hardness using a linear degradation model. Baseline lifespans represent soft-water performance (kettle: 8.5 yrs, washing machine: 12.0 yrs, water heater: 15.0 yrs). Hard water mineral scale progressively reduces operational life in direct proportion to hardness concentration.